Answer:
the answer is D
Explanation:
Question for General Eisenhower’s Order of the Day Commonlit
Which statement best describes the relationship between the war during 1941 and
1944?
A. In both years, the Germans are winning the war, making 1944 an urgent
moment to surprise them.
B. In 1941 the Germans were winning but in 1944 the Allies had dealt them many
losses.
C. In 1941 and 1944, the Allies were winning but not quite able to destroy the
German army.
D. In 1941, the Germans were better trained than the Allies are in 1944.
Answer:ffsds
Explanation:
The best description of the relationship between the war during 1941 and 1944 is in 1941 the Germans were winning but in 1944 the Allies had dealt them many losses. The correct option is (B).
What do you mean by war between 1941 and 1944?World War II, also known as the Second World War, was a battle that spanned nearly the entire globe from 1939 to 1945.
The D-Day mission on June 6, 1944, brought together the allied troops' land, aviation, and marine forces in what became known as the largest invasion force in human history.
On December 7, 1941, Japan launched a surprise assault on American military sites in the Pacific, breaking America's seclusion.
Therefore, in 1941 the Germans were winning but in 1944 the Allies had dealt them many losses is the best description of the relationship between the war between 1941 and 1944.
To know more about the war between 1941 and 1944, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23136093
#SPJ7
please help ill mark brainlist
the measures in the list below are examples of ways southern states weakened the effects of the-
- poll taxes
- literacy tests
- Grandfather Clauses
A ) Compromise of 1850
B ) Fifteenth Amendment
C ) Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
D ) Dred Scott v. Sanford Decision
The measures in the list below are examples of ways southern states weakened the effects of the Fifteenth Amendment. This measures were undertaken to prevent people from voting. Thus, the correct answer is option (B).
What does Fifteenth Amendment contain?The United States Constitution's Fifteenth Amendment prohibits the federal government and each state from rejecting or limiting a citizen's right to vote on basis of race, color, or prior state of subjection ." It was ratified as the third and final of the Reconstruction Amendments on February 3, 1870.
The right to vote for African-American men was guaranteed by the 15th Amendment. African Americans began running for office and voting almost immediately after ratification.
Therefore, the measures like poll taxes, literacy tests and Grandfather Clauses were the effects of Fifteenth Amendment.
To learn more on Fifteenth Amendment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/21179722
#SPJ3
A historian is writing an article for a history website. The article is divided into the following
topics:
• The division of the South into military districts
• The impeachment of the president
• The ratification of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments
Which era in U.S. history is the focus of this article?
O The Antebellum Era
O The Reconstruction Era
O The Jacksonian Era
The Federalist Era
Answer:
The Reconstruction Era
Explanation:
As the war ended, the Reconstruction era began in America, to correct the politics, economy, and society in the South. The 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments adopted during the Reconstruction period. Many of the federal troops were posted to main law and order in the Southern states which led to a military district.
After the death of President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, Andrew Johnson became the next President of the United States. The impeachment of President Andrew Johnson was the issue of political dispute and the separation of ideas in the outcome of the Civil War. Johnson being a democrat struggled to hold power to the reunification of the country.
What concern did the U.S. have with cuba?
Plz help me well mark brainliest if correct!!!
Answer:
C
Explanation:
it is C all day long 24/7
Answer:
idek tbh
Explanation:
Which monarch was originally from the Netherlands?
Anne
George I
William III
Mary 11
Answer:
wiliam III
Explanation:
Why might someone argue that a person should have military experience before serving as president?
A.
A chief diplomat should be prepared to discuss military issues with US allies.
B.
A chief executive should understand how new laws will affect the US military.
C.
A chief of state should be knowledgeable about military history and current issues when meeting with foreign leaders.
D.
A commander in chief should be able to lead the armed forces and make informed decisions about military matters.
Answer:
Its b because chiefs execute the laws of the US military.
Explanation:
mark brainliest pls
In the Electoral College system, the number of electoral votes each state gets is equivalent
to:
the number of members the state has in the House of Representatives.
the number of voters who are registered in the state.
the number of members the state has in the Senate.
the number of members the state has in both houses of Congress.
Answer:
the number of members the state has in both houses of Congress.Explanation:
Answer:
the number of members the state has in both houses of congress.
Explanation:
give me brainlist please!
what religion has roman catholic orthodox protestant in their groups?
Answer:
Christianity
Explanation:
When King Henry VIII wanted a divorce but the pope wouldn’t allow it, he made a new denomination of Christianity called the Church of England. This is Protestantism.
Reflective of the intense productivity of manufacturers like the Tulsa Douglas Plant, __________ manufacturing became a tremendous new industry for Oklahomans during and after World War II. A. explosives B. textile C. aerospace D. agribusiness
Answer:
Answer is C
Explanation:
EDG2021
Italy was a collection of independent city-states for the following
reasons, chose the correct one
A they had not voted to become united and elect a king
B one city-state wanted all the power for themselves and took land from the others
Cthey had no emperors or kings, fought often, were equally strong, and independent
due to riches
D Italy was weak and had little money
Answer: C. they had no emperors or kings, fought often, were equally strong, and independent
due to riches
Explanation:
Italy before unification in the 1800s was a place divided. There existed various City states that held sway over large tracts of territory.
These city states were independent and saw their power increase in direct proportion to their wealth which enabled them to be independent.
These states fought for control alot but none prevailed enough to establish a country wide unification until the 19th century.
what made the first world war a global
Answer:
The first world war was a global conflict because the strong alliances, treaties, and colonies often forced indirectly involved parties into battling each other.
For example:
After a Serb assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria while he was riding around in Bosnia, you, a New Zealander, must fight the Ottomans in Gallipoli because the UK declared war on Germany, in response to Germany's invasion of France and Russia.
When was the Emancipation Proclamation issued
Answer: January 1, 1863
Explanation:
Answer:
January 1, 1863
Explanation:
These history questions to easy read all of them in a textbook
good morning i hope you have good day today can you please help out
Answer:
I think A
Explanation:
It's the only one that makes cence to me, I mean what other reason than gaining power is a reason to down fall a politician.
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
What was the first governing document of the newly created United States, later replaced by the U.S. Constitution
Answer:
Articles of Confederation
Explanation:
brainllest
In 1413 what king of England died
Answer:
Henry of Monmouth
Explanation:
Which of the following was not a popular way to earn a living in the New England colonies?
1. shipbuilding
2. being a merchant
3. farming
4. fishing
Answer:
Farming
Explanation:
People in New England made money through fishing, whaling, shipbuilding, trading in its port cities and providing naval supplies.People in New England could not make a living from farming because most of the land was not suited to farming due to the hilly terrain and rocky soil.
The graph shows changes in life expectancy in the United States over a fifty-year period.
What challenge arose as a result of the trend shown above?
A. educating millions of school-age children
B. providing medical care for an aging population
C. keeping people from leaving the country to retire overseas
D. offering easy-to-follow voting registration procedures
Answer:
I think it is --- providing medical care for an aging population
Explanation:
The question is asking about challenges that came from life expectancy rising, with a longer life expectancy there's going to be an aging population. the other options are don't really fit as we're talking about old ppl not children, old ppl will have already been registered to vote
Should elected representatives make curriculum and textbook standards for our state? Or should another group be tasked with this? Why?
Which numbered pair of phrases best completes the table? Ancestral Puebloan Culture Mississippian Culture (2) Developed in western North America Developed in eastern North America A. (1) Did not produce art (2) Worked together on huge art projects O B. (1) Declined because of weather changes: (2) Declined because of contact with Europeans O C. (1) Lived in small communities (2) Built large cities O D. (1) Developed farming techniques (2) Lived as hunter-gatherers
Answer: C
Explanation:
A P 3 X
Answer: C
Explanation:
Plz help me well mark brainliest if correct!
A distinction the author makes between Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Frances Willard is that only
1)Stanton wrote in favor of women riding bicycles.
2)Willard was actually known to ride a bicycle.
3)Stanton was actually criticized for riding a bike.
4)Willard was a true spokeswoman for the bicycle.
Answer:
2 Willard was a true spokeswoman for the bicycle
Explanation:
A distinction the author makes between Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Frances Willard is that only Willard was a true spokeswoman for the bicycle.Therefore, correct response here is option D.
Who was Frances Willard?
Frances Willard was a well known American educator and temperance reformer. Willard's impact was instrumental during the passage 18th and 19th Amendments to the U.S. constitution.
The author very well know about Willard's conditions and nature. therefore he easily made a difference between Elizabeth and Frances.
Therefore, correct option is D.
Learn more about Elizabeth, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/2166348
How were future new states to decide if they entered the Union as a free or slave state?
Answer:
Well they would have to vote weather they would be free or slave states. Settlers from both the north and the south rushed to the new states and voted there.
describe the difference between real gdp and nominal gdp.
Answer:
Explanation:
The main difference between nominal GDP and real GDP is the adjustment for inflation. Since nominal GDP is calculated using current prices, it does not require any adjustments for inflation.
Answer:
Difference between Real GDP and Nominal GDP is the adjustment for inflation.
A warrant can be issued when ____ A - A biased judge issues one. B - Someone guesses that evidence will be found in a location. C - The evidence to be collected is described in specif. D - A witness's opinion is accepted.
Answer:
C- The evidence to be collected is described in specif.
Explanation:
Place a check mark next to each statement that is true.
Eugene Debs was the founder of the Socialist Party in the United States.
The Socialist Party succeeded in getting Debs elected as president of the
United States in 1908.
Debs began his career as a labor organizer.
The Socialist Party remains active in the United States today.
Debs was an eloquent speaker who did not view himself as a labor leader,
Answer:
1,2,3,4,6,8
Explanation:
Can you write what you analys and evaluate of honor crimes happening in other parts of the world?
Plssss help me
Answer:
Honor crimes are those murders, attacks or other crimes carried out by people who have been offended, against the people who committed the offense. Thus, these crimes are intended to demonstrate, on the part of the criminal and his environment or family group, the power they possess and the consequences that must be faced when damaging the criminal's honor.
In the middle of the 21st century, these crimes continue to be valid in traditionalist societies, such as in the Middle East, and are a clear example of cultural backwardness and the lack of government presence in certain nations, where justice is not impartial but is applied by the tribal chiefs or most powerful people in a community.
The term "principal to a crime":
A.) Applies to both felonies and misdemeanors
B.) Includes accessories
C.) Applies to felonies only
D.) Applies to misdemeanors only
PLZZ HELP
Answer:
[tex]\color{Blue}\huge\boxed{Question} [/tex]
The term "principal to a crime":[tex]\color{Blue}\huge\boxed{Answer} [/tex]
C.Applies to felonies onlyAs a result of the partition of India, the Muslims moved to ___________ and the Hindus moved to ____________.
Answer:
Muslims moved from east Punjab to west Punjab-Hindus moved from west Punjab to east Punjab.
Why do the Progressives believe that the separation of powers and checks and balances were unnecessary?
The Constitution of the United States was initially very controversial. Opponents feared it gave far too much power to the federal government and nearly blocked its ratification.
Today, the great document is revered by most Americans, but there is growing opposition to our Constitutional system. The 21st century opposition comes from the opposite direction: Progressives believe “rigid adherence to past versions of limited government (must) be discarded.” They want a far more powerful federal government and governing bureaucracy.
It’s important to recognize that the progressive challenge to the Constitution is not merely about the size of government. It’s not about how much money they want to spend on new government programs. Whenever sustainable and broad public support is found for such programs, these “big government” views can easily be accommodated within the Constitutional structure.
That wouldn’t surprise the founders of our nation at all. They clearly understood that the power of government could sometimes be used to further the public good.
But the founders also recognized that there was another reality to consider. As James Madison put it in Federalist 41, any “power to advance the public happiness involves a discretion that may be misapplied and abused.” Their struggle to find the right balance was eloquently expressed by Madison in Federalist 51:
“If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.”
The problem, simply put, is human nature. If you give someone power, sooner or later it will have a corrupting influence on them.
The solution arrived at in our Constitution was to create a powerful government, but to separate its powers so no one person or faction could wield that power alone. There would be checks and balances throughout the system, a precaution Madison viewed as “necessary to control the abuses of government.”
The Madisonian system of checks and balances has served our nation well, but it is deeply frustrating to many progressives today. From the progressive perspective, Constitutional checks and balances represent a messy and inefficient process that blocks decisive government action.
Their analysis is correct.
It’s embarrassing at times when the separation of powers is displayed in a public spat between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and President Donald Trump. Disheartening as such displays may be, the ugly competition prevents either from unilaterally imposing their views on the nation. That’s what Madison had in mind when he wrote that “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.”
Progressives are also right that our system of checks and balances can be inefficient. Congress and the president often disagree. So do the House and Senate. And then the courts get involved. Sometimes there are challenges from state governments. The entire process slows things down and generates more modest results.
Much to the chagrin of progressives, that’s the whole idea. The messiness and inefficiency are features not bugs. Because government power can be used for both good and evil, the Constitution requires leaders to build a broad public consensus before that power can be unleashed.
For those who want more government power unleashed, that is a fundamental problem with our Constitution. A pair of law professors from Harvard and Chicago — Eric A. Posner and Adrian Vermeule — believe concern about checks and balances stems from an irrational American “fear of dictatorship.” They call it “tyrannophobia” and are upset that such attitudes were “reflected in the Declaration of Independence and founding debates.”
Not surprisingly, these scholars dismiss Madison’s system as an irrelevant “historical curiosity.” What concerns them is not a fear that government power will be abused. Instead, they worry that lingering “tyrannophobia” is preventing our nation from turning over enough power to presidents and bureaucrats.
It is hard to imagine a more fundamental rejection of our Constitutional order.
Scott Rasmussen is an American political analyst and digital media entrepreneur. He is the author of “The Sun is Still Rising: Politics Has Failed But America Will Not.”
If you want more information just look up your question on the internet and read some articles.