Ok which one would it be can you guys help I will help you guys and give you 35 points

Answer: C. they had no emperors or kings, fought often, were equally strong, and independent

due to riches

Explanation:

Italy before unification in the 1800s was a place divided. There existed various City states that held sway over large tracts of territory.

These city states were independent and saw their power increase in direct proportion to their wealth which enabled them to be independent.

These states fought for control alot but none prevailed enough to establish a country wide unification until the 19th century.

Answer:

Romanticism was a response to 'Neo-classical literature and scientific rationalist thought.'

Explanation:

Romanticism is characterized as the artistic and intellectual literary movement that originated towards the end of the 18th century that stressed emotion, freedom, and individual imagination. It rejected Neo-classicism's rationalist thought and emphasis on objectivity and logic and highlighted the significance of creativity, nature, feelings, and spontaneity. In the 'Preface to Lyrical Ballads,' Wordsworth and Coleridge detaches poetry from rationality and calls it 'a spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings and emotions recollected in tranquility.'

Answer:

1,2,3,4,6,8

Explanation:

Answer:

wiliam III

Explanation:

The Constitution of the United States was initially very controversial. Opponents feared it gave far too much power to the federal government and nearly blocked its ratification.

Today, the great document is revered by most Americans, but there is growing opposition to our Constitutional system. The 21st century opposition comes from the opposite direction: Progressives believe “rigid adherence to past versions of limited government (must) be discarded.” They want a far more powerful federal government and governing bureaucracy.

It’s important to recognize that the progressive challenge to the Constitution is not merely about the size of government. It’s not about how much money they want to spend on new government programs. Whenever sustainable and broad public support is found for such programs, these “big government” views can easily be accommodated within the Constitutional structure.

That wouldn’t surprise the founders of our nation at all. They clearly understood that the power of government could sometimes be used to further the public good.

But the founders also recognized that there was another reality to consider. As James Madison put it in Federalist 41, any “power to advance the public happiness involves a discretion that may be misapplied and abused.” Their struggle to find the right balance was eloquently expressed by Madison in Federalist 51:

“If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.”

The problem, simply put, is human nature. If you give someone power, sooner or later it will have a corrupting influence on them.

The solution arrived at in our Constitution was to create a powerful government, but to separate its powers so no one person or faction could wield that power alone. There would be checks and balances throughout the system, a precaution Madison viewed as “necessary to control the abuses of government.”

The Madisonian system of checks and balances has served our nation well, but it is deeply frustrating to many progressives today. From the progressive perspective, Constitutional checks and balances represent a messy and inefficient process that blocks decisive government action.

Their analysis is correct.

It’s embarrassing at times when the separation of powers is displayed in a public spat between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and President Donald Trump. Disheartening as such displays may be, the ugly competition prevents either from unilaterally imposing their views on the nation. That’s what Madison had in mind when he wrote that “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.”

Progressives are also right that our system of checks and balances can be inefficient. Congress and the president often disagree. So do the House and Senate. And then the courts get involved. Sometimes there are challenges from state governments. The entire process slows things down and generates more modest results.

Much to the chagrin of progressives, that’s the whole idea. The messiness and inefficiency are features not bugs. Because government power can be used for both good and evil, the Constitution requires leaders to build a broad public consensus before that power can be unleashed.

For those who want more government power unleashed, that is a fundamental problem with our Constitution. A pair of law professors from Harvard and Chicago — Eric A. Posner and Adrian Vermeule — believe concern about checks and balances stems from an irrational American “fear of dictatorship.” They call it “tyrannophobia” and are upset that such attitudes were “reflected in the Declaration of Independence and founding debates.”

Not surprisingly, these scholars dismiss Madison’s system as an irrelevant “historical curiosity.” What concerns them is not a fear that government power will be abused. Instead, they worry that lingering “tyrannophobia” is preventing our nation from turning over enough power to presidents and bureaucrats.

It is hard to imagine a more fundamental rejection of our Constitutional order.

Scott Rasmussen is an American political analyst and digital media entrepreneur. He is the author of “The Sun is Still Rising: Politics Has Failed But America Will Not.”

If you want more information just look up your question on the internet and read some articles.

Answer: Musa I (c. 1280 – c. 1337 ), or Mansa Musa, was the tenth Mansa (a military title meaning "conqueror" or "emperor") of the Mali Empire, an Islamic West African state.

...

Mansa Musa

Religion Islam

HOPE THIS HELPS

Answer:

B

Explanation:

The answer is B because they had a highly advanced numeral system with place values.  Maya mathematics were also far ahead of Europe for many centuries.

Answer:

B) Developing advanced mathematics

Explanation:

The Maya had advanced knowledge of astronomy, invented zero, and calculated the exact length of a year.

Answer:

I think A

Explanation:

It's the only one that makes cence to me, I mean what other reason than gaining power is a reason to down fall a politician.

Answer:

The answer is A

Explanation:

Answer:

A or B

Explanation:

It a 50/50 shot. A or B

Answer:

Farming

Explanation:

People in New England made money through fishing, whaling, shipbuilding, trading in its port cities and providing naval supplies.People in New England could not make a living from farming because most of the land was not suited to farming due to the hilly terrain and rocky soil.

Answer:

Hope this helps!

Explanation:

On August 24, 1814, as the War of 1812 raged on, invading British troops marched into Washington and set fire to the U.S. Capitol, the President's Mansion, and other local landmarks.

After Napoleon Bonaparte failed to unite all of Europe under his rule, he was thrown off his throne by the neighboring nations during the War of Liberation on April 11th. This event along with others on April 11, is recapped in this video clip.

Pages in category "1814 deaths"

John Lovejoy Abbot.

Abdullah I Al-Sabah.

John Adams (educational writer)

George Augustus Addison.

Thomas Brudenell-Bruce, 1st Earl of Ailesbury.

Ivan Akimov.

Aleijadinho.

Ira Allen.

A large British army under Sir George Prevost was thus forced to abandon its invasion of the U.S. northeast and retreat to Canada. The American victory on Lake Champlain led to the conclusion of U.S.-British peace negotiations in Belgium, and on December 24, 1814, the Treaty of Ghent was signed, ending the war.

Have a good day!

Answer:

C- The evidence to be collected is described in specif.

Explanation:

state supreme court

In the United States, a state supreme court (known by other names in some states) is the highest court in the state judiciary of a U.S. state. On matters of state law, the judgment of a state supreme court is considered final and binding in both state and federal courts.

Answer:

the other guy is correct, it is C, the supreme court

Explanation:

Answer:

The president uses mass media to gain support for policies.

Explanation:

The use of mass media by presidents of a country is not a new thing. Most leaders of a country use mass media as one of their important aspects or sectors in their administration.

The executive office of the president includes the agencies and offices that work for the President as executive legislation. And this includes the press as well as the communications staff. This is to make the president available and gain mass support. It also enables the president to use mass media to gain support for the policies he wants to execute.

Thus, the correct answer is the second option.

Answer:

Why does the executive office of the president include press and communications staff?

The president uses mass media to speak to Congress.

The president uses mass media to gain support for policies.  <<---Correct

The president uses mass media to issue executive orders.

The president uses mass media to speak to other countries.

Explanation:

Edge 2021

Answer:

the number of members the state has in both houses of Congress.Explanation:

Answer:

the number of members the state has in both houses of congress.

Explanation:

give me brainlist please!

Answer:

Christianity

Explanation:

When King Henry VIII wanted a divorce but the pope wouldn’t allow it, he made a new denomination of Christianity called the Church of England. This is Protestantism.