Answer:
I think it's C
Explanation:
The scen I'm the Forest suggest ...
The scene in the forest suggests a feeling of danger for the characters is the sentence best describes the author's tone. Hence, option C is correct.
the state where individuals become dangerously susceptible to harming themselves or others, endangering their own or others' safety.
Hypervigilance, which is the heightened state of constantly monitoring potential threats around you, is commonly brought on by trauma. Posttraumatic stress disorder, exposure to trauma, and abuse surviving all exhibit the symptom of hypervigilance. PTSD may result from many different types of incidents.
Anything or anything that could harm you, such as active hostilities, is considered to be a threat. Public health specialists assert that there are extra concerns. If there is a chance that something bad will happen, it might happen.
Thus, option C is correct.
For more information about feeling of danger, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/701365
#SPJ2
Write a blog about sports do not copy from the internet please
Unnecessary comments i will report
Answer:
Sports are a major part of our lives. We watch them on TV, we discuss them with friends, and some have even made careers out of being athletes. Sports are more than just a hobby for most people, they are a lifestyle. Sports have always been popular in the United States. More specifically, football is one of the most popular sports in our country as it is the most watched sport in America (NFL). Baseball and basketball follow as the second and third favorite leagues to watch (MLB).Huge investment has been put into bringing sports to everyone’s home over the last 60 years with major broadcasters such as ESPN and NBC bidding for rights bringing games to local and regional markets.Sports are an integral part of American culture. Sports offer opportunities for people of all ages to get involved in healthy, active lifestyles. The benefits of sport participation stretch across generations and impact the health and wellbeing of all Americans.The growth in sport participation is linked not only to its popularity as a pastime, but also to its ability to provide benefits at every stage of life, including improving mental health and academic performance.Sports participation can also be an important link to social capital because it creates opportunities for people to meet new people, develop friendships, improve leadership skills and become engaged with their communities.
Explanation:
o dulce como pétalo de azúcar,
de labio en labio
pasa
gracias,
grandes a plena boca
o susurrantes.
Alguien sabe q se ignifica esto?
Answer:
nani nani nani nani nani nani!
What is the main idea of stanza 1 of "To the Right Honourable William, Earl of Dartmouth"?
Question 9: The man has worked_____ 10 hours. He must be tired now. A. for C. since B. in D. during
Answer: A it makes the most sense to me hope I helped!
What is a complex sentence for the word punitive
Answer:
The attorney stated at the outset of the lawsuit that his client was seeking both monetary and punitive damages for being dismissed without reason.
Explanation:
Answer:
Amanda felt that the court's punitive response was unjust as the man's transgression had only been minor.
Explanation:
“We drove a long distance, and then we stopped for the night.” How should the sentence be classified?
when we draving in night make it slow as much possible don't draved acar
What should be done to treat a second-degree burn?
Answer:
Second-degree burns may be treated with an antibiotic cream or other creams or ointments prescribed by a doctor. Third-degree and fourth-degree burns may need more intensive treatments such as intravenous (IV) antibiotics to prevent infection or IV fluids to replace fluids lost when skin was burned.
Explanation:
hope this helps! goodluck and enjoy the rest of your day /or night.
"Peter Piper picked a pack of pickled peppers" is an example of a(n): *
A. Personification
B. Metaphor
C. Hyperbole
D. Alliteration
The answer is alliteration
Activity 2:Reason out!
Claim of fact
Reason;
Generalization:
Claim of policy;
Reason;
Generalization:
Claim of value;
Reasons:
Generalization
COULD SOMEONE HELP OUT PLEASEEE!!???
Vitamin D is often overlooked as an important component of nutrition. Vitamin D strengthens bones, promotes hair growth, and may even help people with depression. While exposure to sunlight provides us with Vitamin D, not everyone spends time outdoors. Moreover, because Vitamin D is found in fish and dairy foods, people with a vegan diet may not get enough of it. People ought to pay strict attention to the amount of Vitamin D they consume. During the wintertime, when sunlight is at a minimum, it is wise to keep Vitamin D supplements in your home. In this way, you can be sure to stay looking and feeling your best.
Based on the passage, which of these best describes the author's attitude toward Vitamin D?
A.
appreciative
B.
angry
C.
indifferent
D.
curious
A source is likely reliable if the author is an expert AND cites their own
sources.
True
False
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Can someone ANSWER THESE? Will GIVE MANY POINTS!
Answer:
1.) Apocryphal
2.) Crypt
3.) Anachronism
4.) Chronological
5.) Encrypt
6.) Synchronize
7.) Chronic
8.) Cryptogram
Explanation:
You're welcome and please give brainliest:D
Answer:
2. crypt
4. chronological
6. synchronize
8. cryptogram
Explanation:
Can someone plz help me plz I’m begging!! :(
Answer:2
Explanation:
Refer to “The Birthmark” by Nathaniel Hawthorne in Journeys in Literature: American Traditions.
Respond to the prompt.
Authors use paradox to present ideas that, on the surface, seem contradictory. But with deeper analysis, readers figure out that the ideas together make sense. In addition, the intentional pairing of opposing ideas can enhance their meaning or even create new, unexpected meaning.
What are some examples of paradox in “The Birthmark”? How does Hawthorne’s use of paradox affect your understanding of the characters and the plot? Use evidence from the text to support your answer.
An example of a paradox can be seen when Georgina claims that danger means nothing to her.
We can arrive at this answer because:
Georgiana has a birthmark on her face.She feels very bad about this mark because it hurts her self-esteem and makes her sad and embarrassed.For that reason, she insisted that her husband do anything that would allow her to remove that mark from her face.She doesn't mind that it's dangerous, because, to her, the danger has no meaning as long as she gets rid of the birthmark.This is an example of a paradox because it allows two opposing concepts to be presented together. Danger means something very serious, but Georgiana says it doesn't mean anything.
More information on what is a paradox at the link:
https://brainly.com/question/17189565
There are 24 hours in a day. which is your favourite time of day? what do you do at that time?
4am, listen to spotify.
My favorite time of the day is afternoon,when It’s not that hot.Then I either read or play video games.
Is this a WEAK or STRONG thesis statement and WHY.
1)The Burger Basket serves the world's best cheeseburgers.
2)Courts need to assign stronger punishments.
3)Seeing eye dogs, police dogs, and herding dogs are intelligent, working dogs.
The following sentences have been classified as strong or weak thesis statements as follows:
(Strong thesis) 1) The Burger Basket serves the world's best cheeseburgers. (Strong thesis) 2) Courts need to assign stronger punishments. (Weak thesis) 3) Seeing eye dogs, police dogs, and herding dogs are intelligent, working dogs.A thesis statement is a claim that a person makes on a subject. A good and strong thesis statement is specific and debatable.
A strong thesis statement does not have to be made up of long words that can erode the true intent of the writer. It should also be arguable by people who have dissenting views.
The first two statements above are strong thesis because they are specific and debatable. The last statement is too long and broad. These disqualify it as a strong thesis.
Learn more about thesis here:
https://brainly.com/question/24793395
Why is galvanism compared to Frankenstein? Is
galvanism an ethical scientific practice? Use
evidence from the article to support your answer.
so i search up on goo gle and found this
Ruston writes that Shelley was inspired by the concept of galvanism—the idea that scientists could use electricity to stimulate or restart life. ... Frankenstein describes how a lecture on electricity caused him to throw away everything he knew about science
Can you please help me I will give BRAINLIEST
1. do spring begin in March april- it's in march
2. across the meadow speeds the does and her fawn- she's succfully across the medow
3. here are the missing papers- they are all not actually missing
Explanation:
learning how to ride a bike 100 words
Answer:
Practice pedaling circles around the park or parking lot. Once you develop confidence, get off the bike and move your seat up so that your feet reach the pedals with only a very slight bend. Practice navigating cones or obstacles until you get the hang of it. You're riding a bike!
Explanation:
Dracula
When Renfield escapes, where does he go? What happens when Dr. Seward approaches him?
In the book Dracula, when Renfield escapes, the place where he goes next is:
Carfax estate.The thing which happens when Dr. Seward approaches him is:
Renfield attempts to assault them but changes his mind when he sees a big bat moving across the moonBased on the complete text, we can see that Renfield was a vampire like Dracula and was working for him and aiming to please him based on the promises of flies and spiders which were promised to him by Dracula.
With this in mind, we can see that Dr Seward is a man that is obsessed with hunting the undead and goes on hunts, fuelled by morphine and Renfield is next on his list and he tracks him to Carfax estate where he plans to kill him, and there is a standoff.
Read more about Dracula here:
https://brainly.com/question/14199493
learning through experience speech
Answer:
what's your question?
Explanation:
ugh i had to get up at 6:3o and im so tired
And its 6:24 p. m. over here......
Which of the following sentences contains an oxymoron?
After a minor disaster, Lee managed to get his science project set up for viewing by the judges.
My mom pulled the package of fresh frozen peas out of the freezer.
Tyson gave Leona the larger half of the sandwich.
All of the choices are correct.
Answer:
Tyson gave Leona the larger half of the sandwich.
Explanation:
Half is half. 50% and 50% are the same, that means that it is impossible to have a "larger" half of something.
What if the form of a piece of chalk?
Answer:
shells and tiny sea creatures
Explanation:
You have just finished reading chapter 7 of Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe. Upon seeing Okonkwo return from killing Ikemefuna, Nwoye felt something “give way inside him.” Write a narrative story from Nwoye’s point of view emphasizing his feelings about Ikemefuna and Okonkwo at this moment. Your narrative should include imagined actions, thoughts, and dialogue, as long as they are consistent with and connected to the characters in the book
The above question wants to analyze your reading and writing ability and for that reason, I can't write the text for you, but I will show you how to write it.
First, you should read "Things Fall Apart," understand who Ikemefuna, Okonkwo and Nwoye are, know what their relationship is, understand the impact of Ikemefuna's murder and understand how it impacted Okonkwo and Nwoye. To expedite these analyses, you can search for summaries and articles that analyze the story and characters.
Then you can write your text as follows:
Introduce your characters and the context they are related to.Present the impact of Ikemefuna's murder.Show how this event could not have happened.Show the results of that event.Show your feelings towards Okonkwo and his involvement in the murder.Show how the relationship between you and Okonkwo will be from now on.Remember that you must write from Nwoye's point of view. This means that you should write with the first-person narration, making Nwoye the narrator of the story, telling his thoughts and feelings about what happened.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/4481479?referrer=searchResults
https://brainly.com/question/17776815?referrer=searchResults
need help ~~~~~~~~~~~
The type of words that these words stand for are:
Squeal- A high-pitched sound.Shriek- A sound of pain and excitement.Shrill- A piercing sound.Screech- A long high noise.Scream- A loud yell.Squawk- A loud and harsh noise.Squeak- A short, high-pitched sound.Shout- A loud cry.Given the meaning of all these types of sounds, we can generally refer to them as loud noises. So, the meaning of these sounds has been identified above.
Learn more about sounds here:
https://brainly.com/question/9349349
Write a paragraph in which you describe the steps that experienced readers can use to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. Explain why it is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information. Provide specific examples from the two texts. Write a paragraph in which you explain why it matters when the two authors interpret the same facts differently. Using specific examples from the two texts, describe the impact of the author's differing interpretations of the facts on you as a reader. Write a paragraph in which you explain how including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive. Describe the effect that including a conflict and point of view and evidence can have on readers. Give specific examples.
Answer:
Number 1 response:
The steps that experience readers can use to analyze conflicting viewpoints and information on the same topic are trying to understand both viewpoints, do their research, and then look at the conflicting viewpoints on the topic again to see their reasoning and evidence more clearly and so they can understand their opinions. It is very important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information because the advantage of this is they won’t have much of an opinion when they must write an informative response because they’ve seen both sides and both arguments and evidence included. Some examples of this helping I will pull from ‘’Say no to genetically engineered salmon’’ and ‘’Genetically modified salmon can feed the world’’ (both from CNN I will leave the links in the bibliography). Let’s say for example you only read ‘’Say no to genetically engineered salmon’’ your information will be sided and you shall have no choice but to write information about one point of view on the topic making you more likely to mistakenly write an opinionated response whilst if you read both ‘’Say no to genetically engineered salmon’’ AND ‘Genetically modified salmon can feed the world’’ you will not only have an easier time to write a nonopinionated response but you will have more evidence and research on the topic from two sources on the same topic.
Number 2 response:
It matters when two authors interpret facts differently because its more informational when two people have different information about the same subject and you can get the topics on both sides of the argument therefore not have an opiniated topic on the matter and being able to write an informative response or essay. Yonathan Zohar believes genetically modified salmon can be of good use while one the other hand Rick Moonen believes otherwise. Zohar’s reasoning for his opinion is that since a great amount of people are going to eat fish more often because of the health benefits workers are spending more time and money to catch more fish, causing the factories to package them to overfill and causing a handful of fish that used to be extremely common to now barely seen in the wild so in solution he want to genetically modify salmon so more people can be feed and less resources are wasted. Moonen’s reasoning for his opinion is that genetically modified food, in general, is bad for you and he believes it's also a tactic to make already big companies more profit.
Number 3 response:
If you include a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument it can make it more persuasive because lets say you just heard someone say something like ‘’ I think that we should use solar panels from now on anywhere and always no matter what’’, its not much evidence r much of an opinion even but its still a claim. Imagine right after somebody has an opposite opinion like ‘’yes I believe solar panels are more healthy but they’re expensive and if its night time we cant have electricity and if the sun goes dark somehow we will have no power and no way to have light or entertainment or contact’’ its significantly more persuasive because it provides evidence which makes their argument more causing to believe since it seems they know what they are talking about. The effect that the conflicting sides have evidence and fair reasoning can have on readers for people listening can be the fact that they have more information on the topic, that they can understand where both sides are coming from and for readers their response will be a more understanding and informational one and listeners will have more info on the topic like readers. The examples I will pull from ‘’Genetically modified salmon can feed the world’’. Imagine if Yonathon Zohar (the author of ‘genetically modified salmon can feed the world’) just blatantly said I think genetically modified salmon is good for us, no one, would be persuaded to be towards his belief so he put evidence, proof, and reasoning to his viewpoint for example; ‘’ Fish species that used to be plentiful, such as cod, plaice, haddock and others, are now rare in the wild. The king of the oceans, the giant bluefin tuna, is now near the point of no return, its stocks dropping precipitously in the past decade alone.’’ Stating that we are losing our amount of fish because the massive amount of fish we are fishing for food when we can just genetically modify it.
Explanation:
This was on Jiskha, re-word it
Which juror is most likely to sympathize with the defendant due to having a similar background? The 12 Angry Men
Juror 11 is most likely to sympathize with the defendant because both are foreign.
We can arrive at this answer because:
Juror 11 is the only non-American juror.He is a German man who moved to the US because he admired the people and the legal system, which for him was the best and fairest in the world.As the defendant is also an immigrant and this has a very important weight in the case, juror 11 can be very sympathetic with the defendant, as he knows the difficulties of being an immigrant."The 12 Angry Men," tells the story of a Puerto Rican man who is accused of killing his father and must convince 12 jurors that he is innocent.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/5993449
Which narrative point of view is shown in the passage?
She said she had to find some way to keep herself busy now that her sons were taking
off. You said that you hadn't left, not really. ... The bread soon started to burn. She had
made bread only two other times that you could recall. Both times it had burned.
The narrative point of view which is shown in the passage is the:
Third person point of viewAccording to the given question, we are asked to state the narrative point of view which is shown in the passage and how it is effectively used to narrate the events.
As a result of this, we can see that the third person point of view is used by the narrator as he addresses the characters by the name at first ad then makes use of the pronouns "She/He", "Him/Her".
Read more about point of view here:
https://brainly.com/question/647014
Answer:
Explanation:
second person point of view
Corporate culture qualfies as a culture in anthropolgical terms because
Answer:
Corporate culture qualifies as a culture in anthropological terms because. Corporations use anthro to study different human groups and design their products based on their findings.
Explanation: