There were 75 sheep and 60 cows. What is the ratio of the number of cows to the number of sheep at mcneely’s farm

4/9
5/9
4/5
5/4

Answer:

33.

Step-by-step explanation:

I assume that the 2 triangles are similar.

x/77 = 24/56

56x = 77*24

x = (77*24(/56

x = 33.

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

3/4 + 1/4 since they both have a 4 as the denominator you only have to add the top since they made it easy. and since that would be 4/4 your answer would be 1 whole.

Answer:

3/16

Step-by-step explanation:

1/4 of 3/4 is just another way of saying (1/4)*(3/4). When multiplying fractions, you must multiply the numerators and denominators to get the product so the numerator of the products is 1*3 and the denominator is 4*4 to get:

3/16

Answer:

3/16

Step-by-step explanation:

1/4 of 3/4

= 1/4 × 3/4

you multipy the numerators together and then multiply both denominators

ie. 1×3 divided by 4×4

= 3/16

Answer:

Correct option: F.

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope of a line

Suppose we know the line passes through points A(x1,y1) and B(x2,y2). The slope can be calculated with the equation:

[tex]\displaystyle m=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}[/tex]

To show the slope of PR is equal to the slope of RT, we'll use the extreme points of each segment.

For PR, use P=(-7,7) R=(-4,3). Now calculate the slope

[tex]\displaystyle m=\frac{3-7}{-4-(-7)}[/tex]

For RT, use R=(-4,3) (2,-5). Calculate the second slope:

[tex]\displaystyle m=\frac{-5-3}{2-(-4)}[/tex]

If both slopes are equal, then:

[tex]\displaystyle m=\frac{3-7}{-4-(-7)}=\frac{-5-3}{2-(-4)}[/tex]

Correct option: F.

Answer:

8.06 ft or [tex]\sqrt{65}[/tex]  ft

Step-by-step explanation:

Since Rebecca bought a square table and squares have equal sides, you can take the square root of the area of the table, which gives you [tex]\sqrt{65}[/tex]  ft per side. This can be approximated to 8.06 ft.

Answer:

The correct option will be:   c.  8 pieces of wood.Step-by-step

Answer:

Not a Function

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.5818

Step-by-step explanation:

Suppose the average teenage romantic relationship is normally distributed with a mean number of 100 days with a standard deviation of 30 days.

Answer:

The z score is used to determine how many standard deviations that the raw score is above or below the mean. If the z score is positive then the raw score is above the mean and if it is negative then it is below the mean. It is given by:

[tex]z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}\\ \\where\ \mu=mean,\sigma=standard\ deviation, x=raw\ score[/tex]

Given that:

[tex]\mu=100\ days,\sigma=30\ days\\\\For\ x=90\\\\z=\frac{90-100}{30} =-0.33\\\\For\ x=150\\\\z=\frac{150-100}{30} =1.67[/tex]

Therefore, from the normal distribution table, P(90 < x < 150) = P(-0.33 < z < 1.67) = P(z < 1.67) - P(z < -0.33) = 0.9525 - 0.3707 = 0.5818

Answer:

Answer is 12x+4. Hope that helped.

Answer:

-3 = -12

Step-by-step explanation:

Have a great day

I hope that is the answer you are looking for :)

Answer:

The equation in standard form:

2x-y-10=0

Answer:

5/9

Step-by-step explanation:

2/3 • 5/2 • 2/3

1/3 • 2/5 • 2/3

multiply 1/3 for 5/2

5

-----------

3 • 2

multiply 3 for 2

5/6 • 2/3

anular el factor común 2

5/3 • 1/3

multiply 5/3 for 1/3

5

------------

3 • 3

multiply 3 for 3

5/9

the result

5/9

form decimal

0.5

Answer:

52

Step-by-step explanation:

Using GCF:

The factors of 24 are; 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24

Factors of 28 are; 1, 2, 4, 7, 14, 28

The highest greatest common factor is 4.

Now, 4 × 6 gives 24

While 4 × 7 gives 28.

Thus, our original equation is now;

4(6 + 7)

Using distributive property, let's add the number in the bracket first to get;

4(13).

Now,we multiply out to get 52.

Answer:4(7+6)

Step-by-step explanation: i passed the quiz with an 100%

Answer: 43 should be divided into 0.37 to find “x”.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

v=2(x - 1)(x-6)=2(x²-6x-x+6)=12x²-12x-2x+12

v = 12x²-14x+12  standard form

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

That would take you 7 hours to get to your location.

Answer:

There's no evidence to show that the recent experience suggests a decline in spending.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given;

Population mean; μ = $2.5

Population Standard deviation; σ = $0.9

Sample mean; x¯ = $2.1

Sample size; n = 18

Significance level; α = 0.01

Let's define the hypothesis;

Null hypothesis; H0: μ ≥ $2.5

Alternative hypothesis; Ha: μ < $2.5

z-score formula is;

z = (x¯ - μ)/(σ/√n)

z = (2.1 - 2.5)/(0.9/√18)

z = -0.4/0.2121

z = -1.886

Using the p-value from z-score calculator attached and using z = -1.886; α = 0.01; one tail; we have;

P-value = 0.2965

This is more than the significance level. Thus, we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no evidence to show that the recent experience suggests a decline in spending.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  $20,020

Step-by-step explanation:

The future value formula is helpful.

  FV = P(1 +r)^t

  $80,000 = P(1.08^18) = 3.9960195P

  P = $80,000/3.9960195 = $20,019.92

They should invest about $20,020 now.

Answer:

In step by step explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Normal distribution N( 0, 1 )

If the sample size is equal n = 16 we have to use t-student distribution since     n < 30.

In the case n = 36 we should use normal distribution (z tables)

b) We can´t use the  standard normal distribution to calculate the probability that the sample mean falls between 66 and 68 in the first case n < 30 .

We can calculate that  probability in the case of the second sample

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, we want to state if it is unusual or not get a sandwich in 12 minutes given the mean time and the standard deviation.

The answer here is that it is unusual.

The reason why it is unusual is because, two standard deviations above the mean in this case will be 5 + 3 + 3 = 11

Looking at the value given which is 12, we can see that this value is actually greater than the value which is 2 standard deviations above the mean.

What we are saying here is that 12 is greater than two standard deviation above the mean which is valued at 11

im not sure just yet

Answer:

4.05 is greater than 0.45

Given :-

ΔBCD ≅ ΔGEF

Then :-

∠B <=> ∠G ( ∠B = ∠G )

∠C <=> ∠E ( ∠C = ∠E )

∠D <=> ∠F ( ∠ D = ∠F )

BC <=> GE ( BC = GE )

CD <=> EF ( CD = EF )

BD <=> GF ( BD = GF )

Using this let us find CD .

CD = EF

Which means :-

[tex] 3x + 8 = 4x + 6[/tex]

[tex]8 = 4x + 6 - 3x[/tex]

[tex]8 = 1x + 6[/tex]

[tex]1x + 6= 8[/tex]

[tex]1x = 8 - 6[/tex]

[tex]1x = 2[/tex]

[tex]x = 2[/tex]

Then :-

EF =

[tex]EF = 4x + 6 \\ = 4 \times 2 + 6 \\ = 8 + 6 \\ = 14[/tex]

CD =

[tex]CD = 3x + 8 \\ = 3 \times 2 + 8 \\ = 6 + 8 \\ = 14[/tex]

△BCD≅△GEF

The measure of CD is 14

Given :

Two triangles are congruent

△BCD≅△GEF

When triangles are congruent then the sides are equal

[tex]BC=GE\\CD=EF\\DB=FG\\[/tex]

Given that CD=3x+8 and EF=4x+6

[tex]CD=EF\\3x+8=4x+6\\3x+8-3x=4x-3x+6\\8=x+6\\8-6=x+6-6\\x=2[/tex]

The value of x=2

Now we find measure of CD

[tex]CD=3x+8\\CD=3(2)+8\\CD=14[/tex]

The measure of CD is 14

Learn more :  brainly.com/question/18373823

Answer:

24,840,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Round up of numbers includes rounding them up to a given place value.

We are asked to round 24,837,618 to the ten thousands place.

The ten thousands place is the place where the number 3 in the number is located.

The number after 3 = 7 is a number above 5. Hence, we add 1 to 3, making it 4

Therefore, 24,837,618 to the ten thousands place is 24,840,000

Answer:

answer                B

Step-by-step explanation:

just got it right on the test.

Answer:

the answer is B, Maria listed factors of each number instead of multiples.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Option D

Step-by-step explanation:

I got it right

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the first number is

5,555 and

the second number is 4,444

the product of 5,555 and4,444= 24686420

to the nearest thousand 5,555= 6000

to the nearest thousand 4,444= 5000

Therefore the product of 6000 and 5000 is

=6000x5000

=30000000

We're given two pairs of congruent sides, and a pair of congruent angles. The angles are not between the two congruent sides. So we don't have enough information to know if the triangles are congruent or not. SSA is not a valid congruence theorem. This is because there are some cases where two triangles are possible leading to ambiguity.

If the marked angles were between the tickmarked sides, then we could use SAS.

Answer:

16-22

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

i agree with the other person

Step-by-step explanation: