There is 3 questions help asap

Answer:

A histogram shows the frequencies of data in different intervals. So, you cannot read individual values off a histogram alone. With a detailed enough dot plot, you could get very close to the actual team payrolls for each league. A histogram does not give this precision.

Step-by-step explanation:

Plato sample answer

Answer: sure

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

ok so I just got an email from my school saying that you need to do half the semester in ONE WEEK and I'm like, why you didn't need to do this. And also my parents are expecting me to do it ALL IN 2 DAYS AND GET AN A honestly I am very sad I am actually doing an assignment right now lol.

Answer:

Equation

Step-by-step explanation:

Because there is only one unknown term in it

I hope it helps

Thank U

Answer: one angle would be 50 degrees while the other would be 130 degrees.

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\large\underline{\bf \red{Step \:by\: Step \:Explanation:}}[/tex]

Given two equations are :

We may write them as ,

Multiplying equⁿ (i) by 2 :

⇒ 2(2x + y - 6 ) = 0.

⇒ 4x + 2y - 12 = 0 .....................(iii) .

Subtract equⁿ (ii) from equⁿ (iii) :-

⇒ 4x + 2y - 12 = 0

ㅤ- 4x + 3y - 8 = 0 [ Sign changes ]

__________________

⇒ 5y - 20 = 0.ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

⇒ 5y = 20.

⇒ y = 20/5.

⇒ y = 4

Put this value in (i) to obtain x .

⇒ 2x + y - 6 = 0.

⇒ 2x +4 - 6 = 0.

⇒ 2x - 2 = 0.

⇒2x = 2 .

⇒ x = 2/2.

⇒ x = 1 .

Hence the value of x is 1 & y is 4.

[tex]\boxed{\purple{\bf\pink{\dag}\:Hence\:the\: correct\: option\:is\:[b]\:(1,4)}}[/tex]

Answer:

Answer choice on the top right.

Step-by-step explanation:

A function of points can not share the same x value.

Answer:

729 is a perfect square

Step-by-step explanation:

because 27 * 27 = 729

Answer:

[tex]\frac{5}{3}[/tex] is the slope of the line

Step-by-step explanation:

When two lines are perpendicular, their slopes are inverse.

[tex]\frac{3}{5}[/tex] becomes [tex]\frac{5}{3}[/tex] because they are inverse. Just flip the numerator (top number) and denominator(bottom number).

Hope this helps!

Answer:

82

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The probability that the vaccine is not effective in more than 1 of the 20 individuals is equal to:

P = 1 - P(1) - P(0)

Where:

P(1) = probability that the vaccine is not effective in one individual

P(0) = probability that the vaccine is not effective in 0 individuals.

The probability that the vaccine is effective is 0.95

Then the probability that the vaccine is not effective is 0.05.

Then to calculate P(1), suppose that the vaccine is not effective in the first case and then is effective 19 times, this is:

p(1) = (0.05^1)*(0.95^19)

But this only for one case, we have 20 possible permutations (the vaccine is not effective in the first case, the second case, third case, etc)

Then the actual probability is:

P(1) = 20*((0.05^1)*(0.95^19)) = 0.377

And P(0) is easy to compute:

P(0) = (0.05^0)*(0.95^20) = 0.358

And here we have only one possible permutation, so we do not worry about that.

Then P = 1 - P(1) - P(0) = 1 - 0.377 - 0.358 = 0.265

This means that the probability that the vaccine is not effective in more than one individual is of 0.265 (or 26.5% in percentage form)

Answer:

-pi/6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-pi/6 c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

For the first question: C. 32

For the second question: D. 15

Step-by-step explanation:

If 75% of the students are women, and there's 24 women, first you would have to divide 24 by 3. This equals 8. So, add 8 to 24 because 8 is 1/4th of the yoga class. 8 + 24 = 32.

If you mark all of the coordinates and draw lines to make a rectangle, then count all the units until the end of the line, the longer sides are 15 units and the shorter sides are 11 units.

Answer:

33mph

Step-by-step explanation:

because if u divide 99 by 3 that is the answer

Answer:

a) 376.66

b) Option 2: No, the result from part (a) could not be the actual number of adults who said that rising gas prices are "quite annoying" because a count of people must result in a whole.

c) 377

d) 40.77%

Step-by-step explanation:

a) 37% of 1018 is;

37/100 × 1018 = 376.66

b) Thus, the result in a above is not a whole number. Thus;

No, the result from part (a) could not be the actual number of adults who said that rising gas prices are "quite annoying" because a count of people must result in a whole.

c) from a above a, we got a value of 376.66.

Now the actual number would be preferably an integer. Thus, actual number is approximately 377.

d) percentage of respondents said that cellular phones are not at all harmful = 415/1018 × 100% = 40.77%

Answer:

−0.125 or - 1/8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

−n−323

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4838388.34?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0

There is no x or number with an x (example: y= 2x+3, the 2 would be the slope)

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

53.32114

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1/15 kg

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide by 5 can be written as multiply by 1/5

1/3 * 1/5 = 1/15

Answer:

2x-3 =  29

8x = 128

x+7 =  23

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of the angles of a triangle is 180

2x-3 + 8x+ x+7 = 180

Combine like terms

11x+4 = 180

Subtract 4 from each side

11x+4-4= 180-4

11x = 176

Divide by 11

11x/11 =176/11

x =16

2x-3 = 2*16-3 =32-3 = 29

8x = 8*16 =128

x+7 = 16+7 = 23

Answer:

9/2=m

Step-by-step explanation:

3/4=m/6

m/6×3/4

18/4m

9=2m

m=9/2

Answer:

3.55 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

You add the mileage of the two trails which is 1.75+1.8=3.55 miles

The experiment is messed up. Business and rental drivers are usually much more careful in their driving patterns because the car isn't theirs. They are usually adults, experienced drivers who don't put themselves into risky driving situations. =  Speeding, cutting off others etc.. It also didn't tell how  much the cars were driven. There may have been a down turn in the economy and thus less business driving and same with the rentals. If they were used less after the installation then the study wasn't really valid. What was the price of gas before and after the instillation. Who did the study? Did the  previous testers have any reason to skew the study? Did they own stock in the third light business?  Was it the same people who did the study before who did the study afterwords? What was the average age of the drivers before and after? The study group may have aged and calmed down a bit more? What were the technology changes that occurred about the same time? Anti skid brakes, better material and tread designs for the tires, what about the design of the gages and their lighting.  How about the window styles and size..larger windows mean better view and potentially less accidents. What were the safety aspects of the cars before compared to the cars after, were they the same makes and Models or did the rental and business learn that certain cars were safer than others and move to the safer Models? so many variables to consider but did the tester consider them all-probably not. Random studies study only a certain percentage of the total. Who's to say the second random study didn't get less experienced drivers to study? All good what ifs'.

Answer:

ur nan

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

21

Step-by-step explanation: