Based on the man's daughter being a detective, Prisha will most likely D. Challenge the selection of the juror for cause, since he is unlikely to be impartial.
Why would Prisha challenge the selection?In picking the jury, both the prosecution and the defendant will try to make sure that the jury is as impartial as possible.
A man whose daughter is a police detective is not likely to be impartial in a case about the killing of a police officer so Prisha should try to reject him.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on jury selection at https://brainly.com/question/5775524.
With reference to relevant authority, indicate whether a partnership is recognised as a separate entity apart from the partners in terms of South African law.
The common law is the primary source of partnership regulations in South Africa because a partnership is not universally recognized as a separate legal entity separate from its owners.
What is a partnership?A partnership is a business arrangement in which two or more people combine their resources to form a business with the agreement to share risks, profits, and losses.
Examples of common partnerships include:
Law firmsPhysician groups, Real estate investment firmsAccounting groups.Thus, there are no existing partnership laws in South Africa, and partnerships are generally not separate from their owners.
Learn more about partnership businesses at https://brainly.com/question/14034519
If Joe purchases a 55'' screen TV (brand new and still in the box) for $50, from a person that approaches at the corner store, he has committed the offense _________________
An offense of possession of stolen goods is likely to be committed when an individual bought a 55'' screen TV for $50.
What is possession of stolen goods?This means a condition whereby someone handles a stolen goods knowingly or unknowingly whether they are stolen.
Someone who bought a stolen goods is also an offender.
In conclusion, an offense of possession of stolen goods is likely to be committed when an individual bought a 55'' screen TV for $50.
Read more about stolen good
brainly.com/question/590967
Impairment begins with
A. A BAC of 0.05
B. The first drink
C. The second drink of a BAC of 0.08
Impairment can begin with the first drink, as alcohol affects cognitive and physical abilities from the moment it is consumed. However, the legal limit for impairment in many jurisdictions is typically a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08, indicating a higher level of impairment. Therefore, option C is correct.
Impairment refers to the decline or deterioration of one's cognitive and physical abilities due to various factors, such as alcohol consumption, drug use, fatigue, or medical conditions.
In the context of alcohol, impairment occurs when the central nervous system is affected, leading to diminished coordination, judgment, reaction time, and other crucial functions.
Even small amounts of alcohol can impair cognitive and motor skills, which is why it is essential to refrain from activities such as driving or operating machinery when under the influence.
It is crucial to prioritize safety and make responsible choices to prevent accidents and harm to oneself and others.
Learn more about Impairment here:
https://brainly.com/question/30701251
#SPJ1
3 reasons why someone should not create their own laws
Answer: Poeple are bias, there going to creat something that benefit ls them and not everyone, also if one person creates their own law everyone else will want to do it to which would destroyed our economy
Explanation:
What is an advantage of filing a tax return?
A. Refundable tax credits can only be received by filing.
B. Filing federal taxes almost always results in a refund.
C. Completing federal tax forms correctly increases credit scores.
D. Employers regularly check tax returns as part of the hiring process.
Answer:
B refunds
Explanation:
This is because most or all refunds are used to pay back any taxes owed.
1.) If I Can’t Have You. Bertha shot and killed her husband and his lover after discovering them having $exxxx in his car. When an officer came to her house to inform Bertha that her husband had been shot, Bertha broke down and admitted she did it. She also admitted that she had purchased a gun illegally because she suspected her husband of cheating. This confession took place before the officer read Bertha her Miranda rights, although when he went to the house the officer has suspected Bertha. Bertha was convicted of manslaughter because her confession was suppressed. Answer the following questions:
a. You are the trial judge at the sentencing hearing. If you wish, you can rely on the suppressed confession for a sentence enhancement, in effect imposing the same sentence Bertha would have received for second-degree murder. Should you do so? Why or why not?
b. If you were on the appellate court reviewing Bertha’s sentence imposed as described in (a), would you rule that this sentence is fair?
Answer:
There is no right or wrong answer - the question asks about the importance of Miranda Rights and your understandings of them.
Explanation:
a. Depending on the states, second-degree murder usually has a different set of sentencing guidelines from those for manslaughter. So the trial judge may be bounded in the sentencing hearing. Even if the guidelines are the same, the judge would be wise to impose sentence based on the case as presented; which did not included the suppressed confession. If the sentence is based on the confession, the case will be likely be reviewed and may even be over-turned by the appellate court. Judges do not like when their cases get over-turned.
b. It will depend on what the sentencing judge did in (a).
After a federal judge refused to dismiss criminal charges against him, Michael Reed took revenge by electronically filing a UCC financing statement listing the judge as the debtor on a $3.4 million loan. Reed himself was listed as the secured party. The lien became part of the public record. Reed was prosecuted for violating a statute prohibiting harassment of public officials. Reed argued that he was innocent because the financing statement did not list collateral - and would never have succeeded in perfecting a claim. Is this a good argument? Explain why or why not.
Which best describes how the federal budget is created? The House proposes a budget and the president signs it into law after the Senate revises it. The Congress proposes a budget and the president signs it into law after his office revises it. The president proposes a budget and signs it into law after the House and Senate revise it. The Senate proposes a budget and the president signs it into law after the House revises it. the federal budget process starts with the president. Describe how the president creates the proposed budget before sending it to congress
Answer:
The president proposes a budget and signs it into law after the House and Senate revise it.
Explanation:
Got 100% on Edge
With reference to relevant authority, indicate whether a partnership is recognized as a separate entity apart from the partners in terms of SA African law
The common law is the primary source of partnership regulations in South Africa because a partnership is not universally recognized as a separate legal entity apart from the partners.
What is a partnership?A partnership is a business structure whereby two or more partners combine their human and material resources to form an entity.
Partners usually sign a partnership agreement to share risks, profits, and losses. The partnership agreement remains the legal document that establishes a partnership. Where it is not existing, disputes among the partners can be settled using the general partnership agreements.
Examples of common partnerships include:
Law firmsPhysician groups, Real estate investment firmsAccounting groups.Thus, there are no existing partnership laws in South Africa, and partnerships are generally not distinct from their partners, legally speaking.
Learn more about partnership businesses at https://brainly.com/question/14034519
7.) What is the difference between probation and parole?
Answer:
here's your answer
Explanation:
hope it helps you mark me as brainlist
The phrase "parole" refers to criminals who have served their time in a jail facility and have been freed before the deadline set by the court.
When a parolee violates any of the terms set forth by the Board of Parole Commissioners, they must serve their sentence in the community and risk being sent back to prison.
Offenders found guilty of a crime but with a suspended jail sentence are referred to as being on probation. Similar to parole, probation differs from it in that the probationer is still under the authority of the sentencing court and has not yet completed the jail portion of their suspended sentence. Offenders who choose community monitoring rather than incarceration are given probation. For inmates, however, parole is a short-term freedom.
therefore, the above discussed are the difference between parole and probation.
Learn more about Probation here:
https://brainly.com/question/29022681
#SPJ4