Need Help with this assignment please. Explain each keyword in your own words. 1 - caption, 2- heading, 3 - informational text, 4 - sidebar, 5 - text feature. ( Answer questions 1 - 3: Look at the picture for the questions.​ Will Mark Brainliest need two responses

Answer:D

Explanation:

What next to probably happen according to the text is that D. Mr. Enfield will tell the story associated with the door.​

This is known to be a conclusion based on reasoning or evidence.

Hence, we can see that based on the text, the next thing to probably happen is that Mr. Enfield will tell the story associated with the door., as the story goes.

Read more about inference here:

https://brainly.com/question/25280941

#SPJ2

Answer:

Oh.....I’m sorry.

Explanation:

I feel bad for you

Answer:

a,b,d i think not sure

Explanation:

Answer:

this is the only one i can see

Explanation:

Answer:

her, he

Explanation:

her and he are my best friends.

Read the excerpt from Hamlet, Act I, Scene i.

Enter Ghost.

Bernardo: In the same figure, like the king that's dead.

Marcellus: Thou art a scholar; speak to it, Horatio.

Bernardo: Looks it not like the king? mark it, Horatio.

Horatio: Most like: it harrows me with fear and wonder.

Bernardo: It would be spoke to.

Marcellus: Question it, Horatio.

From the interaction of the men, the reader can conclude that Horatio is

feared.

respected.

envied.

bewitched.

Answer:

respected.

Explanation:

From the given excerpt, the men are confronted by a ghost and Bernardo and Marcellus defer to Horatio, asking him to interact with the ghost because he is a scholar.

Therefore, from the interaction, it can be concluded that Horatio is respected.

Answer:

Respected

Explanation:

EDGE 2020 :)

Answer:

The definition of a credible source can change depending on the discipline. But in general, for academic writing, a credible source is one that is unbiased and is backed up with evidence. When writing a research paper, always use and cite credible sources.

Explanation:

Answer:

what

Explanation:

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

The first option is an obvious tell, not a form of figurative language. Option B is more of a simile or a metaphor, comparing two things to show that they are the same or similar. The last option is simply a fact. Option C mentions two objects that are not living, and personification is defined as a type of metaphor in which a nonliving or nonhuman thing is given human characteristics or abilities.

(i seriously hoped this helped! apologies if any mistakes were made :)

Answer:

A- Hyperbole

Explanation:

This is a hyperbole because the person who said this is exaggerating to make it sound like the person can sing really good.

Answer:

It's B

Explanation:

Chemical Weathering is something that can disolve or break something with chemicals. for example : acid rain breaking a rock. acid rain comes from different pollutions and chemicals so it can break something

Answer:

On this question its really just asking you if any adult you know has ever embarrassed you before, if so tell them how and did you feel the same as peter did.

Explanation:

Answer:

How do I think Peter really felt toward Anne?  I think that Peter did not like her at first. She annoyed him all the time and he thought she talked too much. When she puts on his clothes and pretends to be him he likes her less. You can tell that he thinks she is childish. He gets used to her in time and was worried about her when she had a nightmare. A time when an adult did something that embarrassed me was on my birthday. My friends and I were at the high school track field. My mom had taken us there waiting for our movie to start at the theater. She told them that I still rode in a car seat in 5th grade when nobody else did because I am short. I covered my face then changed the subject really quickly. It was super embarrassing. I guess it is different from Peter and Anne's because mine happened around multiple people and they only had a few. I had my friends, who were all girls, while theirs happened between a boy and a girl, which is why it was more embarrassing.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

B

Explanation:

The answer was on page 4 of the lesson

~Good Luck~

Answer:

fr e sh avoca do

Answer:

That's cool. I like rain and since its raining here, i guess we need our umbrellas

but the first sounds the best

Answer: complex

Explanation: this sentence is complex because it contains both a dependent and an independent clause.

Answer:

The answer is number 2: Lola was a selfish, manipulative and conniving girl who would stop at nothing to get what she wanted.

Lola was a selfish, manipulative and conniving girl who would stop at nothing to get what she wanted, these passages are an example of direct characterization. Thus, option (2) is correct.

The term characterization refers to the author are the division of the role are to justify the character in the story. The narrator was to explain the character in the story. It was the nature of the distinctive human nature was the something. The process of the reveal are the character in the story who are the played.

According to the correct on the passage was the based on the direct characterization such as "Lola was a selfish, manipulative and conniving girl who would stop at nothing to get what she wanted." The direct characterization was the perfect in the example as the passage.

As a result, Lola was a selfish, manipulative and conniving girl who would stop at nothing to get what she wanted. Therefore, option (2) is correct.

Learn more about on characterization, here:

https://brainly.com/question/660820

#SPJ2

Answer:

D. The fire

Explanation:

Personification is a figure of speech in which an object or animal is given human characteristics or feelings. It is a very common tool in literature.

In the given excerpt from the novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding personifies the fire. Here, the fire is described as doing things it cannot literally do. Here, it lays hold and begins to gnaw. These are both things people (or animals - e.g. a dog can gnaw a bone) do.

Answer:The answer is C izanami and izanagi have many children that help them take care of the world.

Explanation: I just took the test and got got 100%

Answer:

95% sure its Izanami and Izanagi have many children that help them take care of the world.

Hope this helps

Explanation:

Answer:

triggered by internal deficiencies in development and governance (a lower economic opportunity cost of rebellion in poor areas, unequal distribution in gains from development, political marginalization) or external shocks (economic shocks, calamities, and war).

Answer:

Three strategies to "eradicate your crutch phrase" are:

1) Record your most recent presentation or speech to become aware of your crutch phrase(s).

2) Work with yourself and others to eradicate your tic.

3) Enforce silence by embracing your pauses.

Explanation:

The last strategy is enough preparation before any presentation.  Perfect practice, they say, makes perfect.  As Lisa Braithwaite, the Speak Schmeak coach, puts it, "eradicate your crutch phrase" in order to resonate as a professional and thrill your audience at every speaking opportunity.

Crutch phrases are those often repeated filler words and expressions that unintentionally enter our speeches to hinder them from being fluent.  Most times, because the audience is focused on the speaker, they tend to be distracted by the number of such crutch phrases that are repeated by the speaker in a given presentation.

Answer:

Celebrate: Rejoice:: marry: wed.

Explanation:

An analogy is characterized as the comparison or relationship between two terms, situations, objects, people in terms of resemblance or equivalence for the explanation. In the given analogy, the words 'celebrate' and 'rejoice' convey the same essence of the 'feeling of being happy, delighted, or exult', similarly the words 'marry' and 'wed' denote 'performing the marriage or tieing the knot ceremony between a couple.' Thus, the correct analogy is marry:wed.

Answer:

Explanation:

Because they are do what they want to get pay for

Answer:

2

Explanation:

Answer:

I went to the grocery store last night because I was hungry.

Explanation:

No commas

Answer:

ivalidity and relevance in today's society.

Explanation:

The continuum of care is a key strategy for ensuring comprehensive service delivery for maternal health, while acknowledging the role of the social determinants of health. However, there is little research on the operationalisation of the framework by decision-makers and implementers to address maternal health challenges. The framework should be measurable and feasible for implementation in low- and middle-income country contexts. In this study, we explore experts’ perspective on monitoring indicators for continuum of care and key issues related to their use in the South African context.

Methods

We conducted key informant interviews with a range of experts in decision-making and programme implementation roles in the health system and relevant sectors. Key informants provided their perspectives on systematically selected, nationally representative monitoring indicators in terms of validity, relevance and feasibility. We interviewed 13 key informants and conducted a thematic analysis of their responses using multi-stage coding techniques in Atlas.ti 8.4.

Results

Experts believed that the continuum of care framework and monitoring indicators offer a multisectoral perspective for maternal health intervention missing in current programmes. To improve validity of monitoring indicators, experts suggested reflection on the use of proxy indicators and improvement of data to allow for equity analysis. In terms of relevance and feasibility, experts believe there was potential to foster co-accountability using continuum of care indicators. However, as experts stated, new indicators should be integrated that directly measure intersectoral collaboration for maternal health. In addition, experts recommended that the framework and indicators should evolve over time to reflect evolving policy priorities and public health challenges.

Conclusion

Experts, as decision-makers and implementers, helped identify key issues in the application of the continuum of care framework and its indicators. The use of local indicators can bring the continuum of care framework from an under-utilised strategy to a useful tool for action and decision-making in maternal health. Our findings point to measurement issues and systematic changes needed to improve comprehensive monitoring of maternal health interventions in South Africa. Our methods can be applied to other low- and middle-income countries using the continuum of care framework and locally available indicators.

Keywords: Maternal health, continuum of care, framework, indicators, relevance, feasibility, validity, qualitative

Go to:

Answer: There has been an explosion of coaches everywhere recently. Life coaches, business coaches, We may or may not take them seriously, but we must know something. Most, if not all of them, be it famous ones or not-so-famous ones, agree at one valuable point: goals are crucial. Short-term as well as long-term goals are the key the achieving a more successful life.

What professionals such as Tony Robbins claim is that having goals will provide you with a direction in life. The steps you take will gain value as to whether or not they take you any closer to those goals. If they don’t, the best thing to do would be to evaluate how they can be changed or even left out and substituted for more efficient ones. Robbins, continually tells the story of how he wrote down every single thing he wanted to achieve in life along with the actions he would take to do so – and how he did indeed achieve all of those things.

When it comes to landing that beautiful – and profitable – a dream job, setting a long-term goal can undoubtedly direct your actions. If you choose to focus only on the short-term aspects of work and professional development, odds are that you will end up near-sighted. You will only work hard at things that can bring you immediate compensation. Those things are not naturally going to land the dream job. They will keep you alive, pay bills, and buy some food, but won’t necessarily satisfy the requisites to get to the top, whatever that can mean to you.

If you do choose to have a long-term goal that is dream-job related, the chances are that you will choose different paths. You will not see that ten-month course as a waste of time, since it will give you useful skills. You will spend your money more wisely, viewing it more as an investment than as a necessary evil. You will gain a new perspective of what time means and develop the sense that immediacy is overrated.

There are those who call themselves realistic or, more honestly, pessimistic. They may claim that setting long-term goals is nothing but a recipe to feeling like a failure. Truth be told, it is indeed possible that you won’t achieve every single thing you wish for, which is actually in most cases for us that we don't necessarily achieve our every goal. It might be our lack of willpower or that our goal was just not engineered very well. So that is a reality not only for you but for everyone else on this planet. However, not achieving something should not be a synonym for failure. It can mean some rethinking is important, some assessing needs to be done, a new plan should be concocted. Great minds’ goals, such as Elon Musk, are not only long term but also ambitious. And if they fail on their way, they find the means to try again, now with improved knowledge from the previously failed experience.

Tony Robbins says that “most people overestimate what they can do in a year, and underestimate what they can do in a decade.” That is the real recipe for failure: seeing time as a factor of stress and pressure instead of an ally. By giving yourself a grand goal and a good amount of time to do it – such as landing the dream job in five to ten years, you are being more realistic than you would be by either giving up altogether or trying to do it impossibly quickly. Landing a dream job takes time and effort, but as long as you set good reasonable goals, you can accomplice almost anything.

Explanation: Wasn't really any mistakes to begin with but Good job!!

Answer:

Please give me brainliest

Explanation:

There has been an explosion of coaches everywhere recently. There is life coaches, business coaches, We may or may not take them seriously, but we must know something. Most, if not all of them, be it famous ones or not-so-famous ones, agree at one valuable point: goals are crucial. Short-term as well as long-term goals are the key to achieving a more successful life. Professionals such as Tony Robbins claims that having goals will provide you with a new direction in life. The steps you take will gain value as to whether or not they take you any closer to achieving your goals. If they don’t work out, the best thing to do would be to evaluate how they can be changed or even left out and substituted for more efficient ones. Robbins, continually tells the story of how he wrote down every single thing he wanted to achieve in life along with the actions he would take to do so. He did infact achieve all of those things.

When it comes to landing that beautiful, and profitable, dream job, setting a long-term goal can undoubtedly direct your actions. If you choose to focus only on the short-term aspects of work and professional development, odds are that you will end up near-sighted. You will only work hard at things that can bring you immediate compensation. Those things are not naturally going to land the dream job. They will keep you alive, pay bills, and buy some food, but won’t necessarily satisfy the requisites to get to the top, whatever that can mean to you.

If you do choose to have a long-term goal that is dream-job related, the chances are that you will choose different paths. You will not see that ten-month course as a waste of time, since it will give you useful skills. You will spend your money more wisely, viewing it more as an investment than as a necessary evil. You will gain a new perspective of what time means and develop the sense that immediacy is overrated.

There are those who call themselves realistic or, more honestly, pessimistic. They may claim that setting long-term goals is nothing but a recipe to feeling like a failure. Truth be told, it is indeed possible that you won’t achieve every single thing you wish for, which is actually in most cases for us that we don't necessarily achieve our every goal. It might be our lack of willpower or that our goal was just not engineered very well. So that is a reality not only for you but for everyone else on this planet. However, not achieving something should not be a synonym for failure. It can mean some rethinking is important, some assessing needs to be done, a new plan should be concocted. Great minds’ goals, such as Elon Musk, are not only long term but also ambitious. And if they fail on their way, they find the means to try again, now with improved knowledge from the previously failed experience.

Tony Robbins says that “most people overestimate what they can do in a year, and underestimate what they can do in a decade.” That is the real recipe for failure: seeing time as a factor of stress and pressure instead of an ally. By giving yourself a grand goal and a good amount of time to do it – such as landing the dream job in five to ten years, you are being more realistic than you would be by either giving up altogether or trying to do it impossibly quickly. Landing a dream job takes time and effort, but as long as you set good reasonable goals, you can accomplice almost anything.

Answer:

I would say either C or E

Explanation: