Answer:
court of original jurisdiction has the power to hear cases as they re first initiated by a prosecutor. court of appellate jurisdiction many only hear the action after the court of original jurisdiction has heard the case
Explanation:
Impairment begins with
A. A BAC of 0.05
B. The first drink
C. The second drink of a BAC of 0.08
Impairment can begin with the first drink, as alcohol affects cognitive and physical abilities from the moment it is consumed. However, the legal limit for impairment in many jurisdictions is typically a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08, indicating a higher level of impairment. Therefore, option C is correct.
Impairment refers to the decline or deterioration of one's cognitive and physical abilities due to various factors, such as alcohol consumption, drug use, fatigue, or medical conditions.
In the context of alcohol, impairment occurs when the central nervous system is affected, leading to diminished coordination, judgment, reaction time, and other crucial functions.
Even small amounts of alcohol can impair cognitive and motor skills, which is why it is essential to refrain from activities such as driving or operating machinery when under the influence.
It is crucial to prioritize safety and make responsible choices to prevent accidents and harm to oneself and others.
Learn more about Impairment here:
https://brainly.com/question/30701251
#SPJ1
what are most important subject if you're doing law that can help you find a great job?
Answer: Hope that helps!
Explanation: Law school is hard work. Surround yourself with people who are proactive and think positively. Work hard and have fun.” “Do what you have always done. Do not change your study habits to match those of other students.” “Don't fall for every piece of advice you hear.
30 Points ( i have 3 more if you answer all of them you can get 120 points)
What do you think is the biggest cost of war? Why do you think countries continue to fight in spite of the costs?
Answer:
The biggest cost is the country's people
Explanation:
They still continue to fight because the urge to win and to be victorious outweighs the guilt they feel. In their minds, the lives of their people is worth it. It's pure selfishness and greed. In some twisted way, the ends justify the means.
With reference to relevant authority, indicate whether a partnership is recognised as a separate entity apart from the partners in terms of South African law.
The common law is the primary source of partnership regulations in South Africa because a partnership is not universally recognized as a separate legal entity separate from its owners.
What is a partnership?A partnership is a business arrangement in which two or more people combine their resources to form a business with the agreement to share risks, profits, and losses.
Examples of common partnerships include:
Law firmsPhysician groups, Real estate investment firmsAccounting groups.Thus, there are no existing partnership laws in South Africa, and partnerships are generally not separate from their owners.
Learn more about partnership businesses at https://brainly.com/question/14034519
Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep-Breeders' Association
Prisha is an attorney who is defending a man accused of murdering a police officer. During voir dire, she asks if any jurors have family that are in law enforcement. One man raises his hand, stating that his daughter is a detective. What action would Prisha MOST likely take?
A.
Accept this juror because he is able to be impartial.
B.
Accept this juror because he and the defendant are both men.
C.
Hope that the prosecutions uses a preemptory challenge on the juror.
D.
Challenge the selection of the juror for cause, since he is unlikely to be impartial.
Based on the man's daughter being a detective, Prisha will most likely D. Challenge the selection of the juror for cause, since he is unlikely to be impartial.
Why would Prisha challenge the selection?In picking the jury, both the prosecution and the defendant will try to make sure that the jury is as impartial as possible.
A man whose daughter is a police detective is not likely to be impartial in a case about the killing of a police officer so Prisha should try to reject him.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on jury selection at https://brainly.com/question/5775524.
Zoe sees a well-dressed woman on the train with a pair of black laced boots. What action on Zoe's part would be the BEST example of deviant
behavior?
a. telling the women she likes her boots
b. not saying anything to the women
c. asking the women if she can try on her boots
d. asking the women where she purchased her boots
Answer:
asking the woman if she can try on her boots
Explanation:
Zoe sees a well-dressed woman on the train with a pair of black laced boots.
If you cannot clearly discern time and distance, ...
A. you will tend to drive more slowly.
B. your speed control will be consistent.
C. you will have poor speed control.
If you cannot clearly discern time and distance, you will have poor speed control. Thus the correct answer is C.
What is the distance?Distance is the aggregate of an object's activities, regardless of direction. It also serves as a scale for the distance between these two objects. Any path can be used to measure it.
When the driver is not clearly discerned time and distance it will lead to poor speed control which may result in injury or accidents as it depends on the driver how much time it takes for you to realize that you need to stop when something is wrong.
This timely decision helps drivers to aware of the risk and make themselves safe from the situation.
Therefore, option C is appropriate.
Learn more about distance, here:
https://brainly.com/question/26711747
#SPJ5
Question 8 (10 points)
Are the states that are requiring members of the LGBTQ community to use the bathroom that is assigned
to their biology a variation of the "Plessy" issue? Why or why not?
Answer:
no because if you are a boy use the boy bathrooms
Explanation:
thats bc you stand to pee and girls dont. same with girls they sit so they cant use a urinal.
Can is assume that some people shouldn’t use technology based on there actions?
Can someone help me answer this question or make a sentence also can you add “for example…”
SECTION ONE: answer either 1A or 1B 1A Consider the following scenario. Below the scenario, I have provided you with a simple egoist analysis of the two courses of action. Use the facts given in the scenario to expand the egoist analysis into a utilitarian analysis. Your answer should be in the same list/chart format as the “Egoist Analysis” I provide below, with actions, outcomes with points, a point total for each action, and an identification of the action Joe should pick based on the analysis.
Based on the analysis, Joe did pick Action B ( where Joe has a good time playing ball, he feels guilty about breaking his promise and Kat finds out that Joe lied, and Joe's friendship with her suffers because it is the option that has lesser consequences.
When you look at the situation of Joe in terms of Egoist Analysis, he has the self interest to play ball with his friends and also pick up Kat but also he shifted to the use of utilitarian in basing his judgment.
This is not because of his self interest but because his friend is moving out of town and that would be the last time they ever play together.
He look at the option that has more consequences (collective baseball friends he will disappoint if he did not go) and just one friend who he can see later and explain reasons to.
What is the role of egoism and utilitarianism?
The word egoism is known to center around the psychological theory that deals with the nature of human motives.
Psychological egoism is one that state that all behaviors are said to be influenced by self-interest. In other words, it suggests that every That is any action or behavior or decision of all is due to our self interest.
Utilitarianism is known to be a theory that deals with morality. It is one that stands for any actions that result in happiness or pleasure and is one that is against any actions that cause unhappiness or harm.
Learn more about egoist from
https://brainly.com/question/13721004
1.) If I Can’t Have You. Bertha shot and killed her husband and his lover after discovering them having $exxxx in his car. When an officer came to her house to inform Bertha that her husband had been shot, Bertha broke down and admitted she did it. She also admitted that she had purchased a gun illegally because she suspected her husband of cheating. This confession took place before the officer read Bertha her Miranda rights, although when he went to the house the officer has suspected Bertha. Bertha was convicted of manslaughter because her confession was suppressed. Answer the following questions:
a. You are the trial judge at the sentencing hearing. If you wish, you can rely on the suppressed confession for a sentence enhancement, in effect imposing the same sentence Bertha would have received for second-degree murder. Should you do so? Why or why not?
b. If you were on the appellate court reviewing Bertha’s sentence imposed as described in (a), would you rule that this sentence is fair?
Answer:
There is no right or wrong answer - the question asks about the importance of Miranda Rights and your understandings of them.
Explanation:
a. Depending on the states, second-degree murder usually has a different set of sentencing guidelines from those for manslaughter. So the trial judge may be bounded in the sentencing hearing. Even if the guidelines are the same, the judge would be wise to impose sentence based on the case as presented; which did not included the suppressed confession. If the sentence is based on the confession, the case will be likely be reviewed and may even be over-turned by the appellate court. Judges do not like when their cases get over-turned.
b. It will depend on what the sentencing judge did in (a).
A glass rod becomes positively charged when it is rubbed with
silk. This net positive charge accumulates because the glass rod
Answer:
lose electron
Explanation:
the big breakthrough for positivistic criminology came with
Positivistic criminology came with a scientific findings and not just an assumption of an individual behavior.
What is positivistic criminologyPositivistic criminology aim at finding proves or evidence to why an individual perform a particular criminal act.
It involves scientific research and finding s to know what influence an individual act.
The breakthrough came with ability to research in behavior of an individual and characteristics that governs a behavior.
Learn more on criminal act here,
https://brainly.com/question/1242041
How much influence does the media have on your beliefs regarding controversial topics?
Due to a large inheritance, a policyowner no longer needs a life insurance policy and agrees to sell it to a third party for more than its cash value. This type of transaction is called a
Due to a large inheritance, a Life Insurance policy owner no longer requires the policy and agrees to sell it to a third party for more than its cash value. This type of transaction is called a Life Settlement.
What is the Purpose of a Life Settlement Contract?The Life Settlement Contract is simply a contract that transfers the insurance cover afforded by the Life Insurance Policy form one person to another.
The life assured of the new holder of the policyholder becomes eligible to receive the benefits of the policy when the insured dies while the policyholder takes responsibility for payment of premiums.
Learn more about Life Settlement at:
https://brainly.com/question/570009
Match each example to the type of law it reflects.
A. civil law
B. criminal law
C. military law
D. constitutional law
1. A senator attempts to stop a newspaper from exercising its freedom to report on the senator’s corruption scandal.
2. Joanne has cheated her business partner.
3. Mark is accused of stealing supplies while serving in the US Army.
4. Jon robs a bank and steals thousands of dollars.
Answer: yes
Explanation:
1 goes with D
2 goes with A
3 goes C
4 goes with B
Do you think judges should be elected at all considering that most of the public is not educated in the
ways of the legal system?
Answer:
Ok, I would say: NO
Explanation:
This is also taking into account my own beliefs. For someone else, it might be yes.
How do registration laws very among states
Answer:
In the states and the District of Columbia, lawmakers last year considered more than 2,900 bills dealing with elections and voting, and enacted more than 350, according to a tally by the National Conference of State Legislatures.
The changes include deadlines for registration, pay for election workers and many other details. But the overarching story is that there are simultaneous pushes across the country to make it easier or harder to register and vote.
Explanation:
7.) What is the difference between probation and parole?
Answer:
here's your answer
Explanation:
hope it helps you mark me as brainlist
The phrase "parole" refers to criminals who have served their time in a jail facility and have been freed before the deadline set by the court.
When a parolee violates any of the terms set forth by the Board of Parole Commissioners, they must serve their sentence in the community and risk being sent back to prison.
Offenders found guilty of a crime but with a suspended jail sentence are referred to as being on probation. Similar to parole, probation differs from it in that the probationer is still under the authority of the sentencing court and has not yet completed the jail portion of their suspended sentence. Offenders who choose community monitoring rather than incarceration are given probation. For inmates, however, parole is a short-term freedom.
therefore, the above discussed are the difference between parole and probation.
Learn more about Probation here:
https://brainly.com/question/29022681
#SPJ4
After a federal judge refused to dismiss criminal charges against him, Michael Reed took revenge by electronically filing a UCC financing statement listing the judge as the debtor on a $3.4 million loan. Reed himself was listed as the secured party. The lien became part of the public record. Reed was prosecuted for violating a statute prohibiting harassment of public officials. Reed argued that he was innocent because the financing statement did not list collateral - and would never have succeeded in perfecting a claim. Is this a good argument? Explain why or why not.
What is an advantage of filing a tax return?
A. Refundable tax credits can only be received by filing.
B. Filing federal taxes almost always results in a refund.
C. Completing federal tax forms correctly increases credit scores.
D. Employers regularly check tax returns as part of the hiring process.
Answer:
B refunds
Explanation:
This is because most or all refunds are used to pay back any taxes owed.
Who has the right-of-way at a four-way stop?
Answer:
If 2 or even more cars reach a 4 stop junction at the same moment, the automobile to the right seems to have the right of way after halting. Red light is flashing - It really should be interpreted as a stop sign; halt and yield to vehicles travelling in the adjoining road.
Alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence are the same? True or false
Answer:
I believe the answer is false
When a judge excludes all witnesses from the courtroom, except for the person testifying, it is called _____.
Answer:
Sequestering
Explanation:
a practice used during the trial whereby the judge excludes all witnesses from the courtroom except the person testifying.
Please dont report. A few kids in my grade said they are gonna jump me. Ive been carrying a knife. What would happen if they attacked me and i defended myself with the knife?
Answer:
/
Explanation:
I don't think it would be best to have a knife for advice but if they're gonna jump you, you really gotta defend yourself.
10. Which one of the following is NOT a suggestion for staying alert while driving:
O Sing with the radio.
O Drink an energy drink.
O Stop for a while and walk around the car.
O Turn on the air conditioning / Roll down the window.
Answer:
Drink an energy drink.
Explanation:
Drinking an energy drink is NOT a suggestion for staying alert while driving. Option B. This is further explained below.
What is Drink?Generally, Drink is simply defined as swallowing after putting it in the mouth.
In conclusion, Drinking an energy drink is NOT a tip for remaining aware while driving.
Read more about Drink
https://brainly.com/question/10922020
#SPJ2
6.) What is the current legal status of habitual-offender laws, such as three-strikes laws?
Answer:
The three-strikes law significantly increases the prison sentences of persons convicted of a felony who have been previously convicted of two or more violent crimes or serious felonies, and limits the ability of these offenders to receive a punishment other than a life sentence.
Explanation:
pls mark as brain list
After being stopped and searched on Belsize road and being arrested for having stolen credit cards the following occurred "As we drove away, D.S. Carter told me that we were going to my home address to search it. We drove to my house, and we all got out of the car. I felt I had no option but to let them into the house. Gregory and Felicity were not at home. The two officers searched the lounge looking in drawers and cupboards. They did the same in the kitchen, the bathroom and the two bedrooms. In my bedroom they found a small box in a bedside drawer. Inside it they found some cannabis. Very occasionally Gregory and I smoke some cannabis. This cannabis had been there for some time. I told the officers that it was cannabis just for personal use. It was only a small amount. D.S. Carter said, “you are also under arrest for this.”"
Questions:
Can the police legally enter and search the home without a warrant? please use relevant case and laws
Answer:I hope that helps!
Explanation: The police cannot search your home or belongings without a warrant, but there are exceptions. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects private citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures.
This case made the 2nd Amendment's right to bear arms applicable to the States,as a fundamental right.
The answer is District of Columbia v. Heller